First
and foremost I am a Christian. I am also a Conservative American. I am a free
man. I have lived in San Diego my entire life and my roots can be traced back
at least 6 generations here. I am happily married and I have 4 children. You
may be asking yourself, “Why did he just tell us all of this about himself?”
The reason is that I want you to know I am speaking from the stand point of a
father, husband, Christian, Conservative, a 6 generation San Diegan and a free
American.
There are five things I wish to cover in this article.
First being my stance on the Corona Virus. Second, how our lives have changed
since the pandemic. Third, my opinion on Vaccines. Fourth, what the future
holds now that so much has changed. And lastly, what we should do as both
Americans and Christians.
My stance on this Caronavirus may seem unpopular, but
believe it or not, there are a lot of Americans who hold the same views as I
do. I had written a more in depth article regarding my stance about a month
ago. I do not wish to just copy and paste the entire article to substantiate my
beliefs. Instead, I have chosen 3 of the most important arguments in favor of
my case. When I began writing the article, I was under the impression that the
virus was a little worse than the seasonal flu. Half way through writing the
paper, I changed my stance and was convinced that the virus was just like the seasonal
flu. When I finished writing the paper, I changed my stance for the last time
and am now convinced that the seasonal flu is actual more worse than the
Coronavirus.
My first
argument in my paper was in response to those who claimed that you cannot
compare the Virus to the Seasonal Flu because the deaths per infection rate is
far greater for the virus. “The Seasonal Flu death per infection is 0.1% while
the Coronavirus is 1.5%.” This argument from my opponent holds no authority
because their numbers cannot be trusted. To show you why they cannot be
trusted, we must start at the beginning. When and where did the virus start?
It was on November 17, 2019 in China that the first
Covid-19 case was confirmed (11). Hear me when I say this because that was the
first confirmed case does not mean that November 17, 2019 was the start
date of the Virus. He was not patient zero. My opponents wish to claim that the
virus is more dangerous then the seasonal flu because of how insanely fast the
virus spreads, and yet, the Chinese government wants us to believe that from
November 17 to the first day of 2020, there were only 38 cases. Common sense
and logic would say otherwise. (11).
Another
point to be made is that Doctors were not able to accurately test in the
beginning. On January 17,
2020, there was a press briefing with the CDC where a reporter, Mike Stable,
stated and asked, the “CDC is trying to develop the diagnostic test to
determine the virus, but when you all will be screening people, you’ll be
looking at symptoms. You wont be able to actually test for the virus, is that
correct?”
Dr. Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National
Center for Immunization and Respiratory Disease, responded with, “We actually
do have a laboratory diagnostics here at CDC that are stood up. The first
diagnostic that we’d be relying on is based on sequence. Our colleagues in
China…identified this pathogen and put that sequence up where it’s publicly
available to all scientists. That is how our colleagues in Japan and Thailand
identified cases. They compared the sequences that they found in their patients
to the sequence that the Chinese collaborators posted. So we at the CDC also
have the ability to do that today, but we are working on a more specific diagnostic” (12).
As you can see, our tests were not accurate until
February (13). This tells us that whatever numbers we had until accurate tests
arose cannot be fully trusted. It is by these very numbers that the models
distinguishing the deaths per infection, but now you have seen reason to
CONSIDER questioning these models.
Allow me to give you more evidence for why I find myself,
and many others for that matter, believing that the mortality rate for the Coronavirus is .01%.
Two professors of medicine at Stanford, Dr. Bendavid and
Dr. Bhattacharya have critiqued the proposed models that so many have followed
and instead offer their own. “The epidemic started sometime in November…the
first confirmed U.S. case included a person who traveled from Wuhan on January
15th, but it is likely that the virus entered before that: tens of
thousands of people traveled from Wuhan to the U.S. in December. Existing
evidence suggests that the virus is highly transmissible and that the number of
infections doubles roughly every three days. An epidemic seed on January1st
implies that by March 9 about 6 million people in the U.S. would have been
infected. As of March 23 according to the CDC, there were 499 Covid-19 deaths
in the U.S. If our surmise of 6 million cases is accurate, that’s a mortality
rate of .01% assuming a two-week lag between infection and death. This is
one-tenth of the flu mortality rate of 0.1%.”
Another critique of the popular models that so much fear
has been based upon comes from Professor of Theoretical Epidemiology Sunatra
Gupta and her team from Oxford University on March 24th. They suggest that “up to 68% of the
population may have already been infected with the virus – many without knowing
it. Professor Gupta…has suggested that… only through testing for antibodies can
real certainty about rates of infections be obtained” (14). As I write this
article on April 24th the antibody tests have already begun.
Researchers at Stanford Medicine tested 3,200 people in the Bay Area.
Victor
Davis Hanson with the Stanfords Hoover Institute said, “When you add it all up
it would be naïve to think that California did not have some exposure.” Hanson
went onto say that “the Chinese government has been disingenuous about the
timing of their initial outbreak of Covid-19. ‘They originally said it was in
early January, then it got backdated to December and then early December and
now they are saying as early as November 17’” (15).
On April
22, 2020 Buzzfeed released an article titled, “Two Antibody Studies Say
Coronavirus Infections Are More Common than We Think. Scientists Are Mad.” “In
Silicon Valley, the true number of coronavirus infections could be 50 to 85%
times higher than the number of reported ones. And in Los Angeles County, there
might be 28 to 55 times more people infected then the official count.
“The numbers, covered in the national press and shared
widely across social media, suggested that far more people than previously
realized have ‘hidden’ infections. If that many people have already gotten
sick, it also changes the calculation about how frequently the virus can lead
to death. In the U.S., death rates number driven in part by ‘lack of diagnostic
testing.’
“But the new numbers out of Northern California suggests
the virus may kill a much smaller position of the wider pool of diagnosed and
undiagnosed cases, in this case around .12% to 0.2%. That would be closer to
the death rate for the flu, which is about 0.1%” (16).
My last piece of evidence in support of my claims was
recently released accidently. There was a “hot mic” on the press conference
floor before the press conference began.
The following is the dialogue between two individuals (a reporter and
photographer) discussing the number of cases in California. “USC and LA County
public health came out with a study that found that there are 7,000 cases in CA
but they really believe there are anywhere from 210,000 to 442,000 people who
were infected” (17).
In conclusion, you had said the Coronavirus death per
infection is 1.5%. That is incorrect for 4 reasons.
1.
The
models can’t be trusted because they didn’t consider those who were infected
prior to testing.
2.
The
number of deaths are incorrect and were manipulated
3.
The
antibody tests have revealed that more people had the virus than previously calculated
4.
The
press was talking about the numbers of infections being manipulated to bring up
the deaths per infections
Conclusion,
you cannot deny these findings. If you cannot admit that the death rate per
infection is inaccurate, then you are willingly lost.
My second argument in favor of my stance is in response
to the people that say that “this virus has taken the lives of both old and
young, healthy and unhealthy alike. And you cannot compare this to the seasonal
flu that only kills those whose immune systems are compromised.”
This is
an interesting argument. It presupposes that every death recorded is viable and
accurate and beyond a shadow of a doubt. All I would need to do is shed some
doubt on the validity of these causes of death and the premise loses its
authority. Thus, I have two examples I wish to use regarding this topic.
The first is brought to us by Candace Owens, a
Conservative political activist and commentator. On the first of April,
Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont announced “the first pediatric fatality in
Connecticut linked to Covid-19.” Candace Owens responded to what the Governor
stated by saying, “‘Linked to Covid-19’ What the hell does that mean? Did the
newborn have pre-existing conditions – yes or no? Did the infant die of
Coronavirus – yes or no? STOP with this political double speak. Scaring mothers
of newborns with partial information is SCUM BEHAVIOR. ‘Complicated by’ ‘Linked to’ has anybody else realized that
ALL of these death announcements provide partial information? If you are going
to start using the death of infants to scare people into doing what you want,
you better start providing Full information, [Gov. Lamont].”
It turns out, the infant’s death had nothing to do with
Covid-19. It was a horrible accident at home (8).
Another example that should cause doubt regarding the
validity of these supposed Covid-19 deaths comes from the mouth of Dr. Deborah
Birx. She is the Doctor standing beside
President Trump and Dr. Fauci in the press conferences you have been
watching. She said, “The federal government is classifying the deaths of
patients infected with the Coronavirus as Covid-19 deaths, regardless of any
underlying health issues that could have contributed to the loss of someone’s
life” (9). Right here you have a confession from the response coordinator for
the White House coronavirus task force—the
same people that give you the number of “Covid” deaths.
An even stronger rebuttal to this argument comes from an
article published by the San Diego Union Tribune on January 17, 2018,
regarding the flu epidemic that year, “younger people have not come through
unscathed. An 18-year-old man and a 26-year-old woman, both unvaccinated, but
with no other health problems, have died in what county officials and the U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are now calling a flu epidemic” (10). I know not what else I can say except that it is true that
people are dying from this virus, but the same goes for the seasonal flu. The
main difference between this Virus and every other Seasonal flu is that we are
watching this Virus under a microscope. Every death, every infection, every
fever, cough, sneeze is being publicized. It is from this media publicity that
so much fear has stemmed. Deaths and infections you would have never heard of
are now front page news. This also serves as further evidence for my closing
rebuttal to argument #5 because this virus was here in November, but no one noticed.
My third argument in favor of my
stance is in response to when those in favor of the severity of the Coronavirus
say that “it is far different than the seasonal flu in that the symptoms are
far more worse.”
The
Media is quite vocal regarding the effects of this virus. The CDC gives full
account to the symptoms of the Coronavirus and the Seasonal Flu. The symptoms
for the seasonal flu range from a headache, congestion, sore throat, fatigue,
body aches, fever, vomiting, shortness of breath, diarrhea, and yes… even
death. It can also lead to pneumonia as I can personally attest to when my
2-year-old’s flu grew worse and lead to pneumonia. The symptoms of the
Coronavirus are shortness of breath, cough, fatigue, fever, and even death.
For the seasonal flu, those who are most affected are
children, the elderly, and the immune compromised. For the Coronavirus, those
most affected are the elderly and the immune compromised.
Consider the testimonies from those who suffered from the
Coronavirus and compare it to the Seasonal Flu:. I can give examples of those
who had a fever for a week’s time, others who suffered from a cough and
shortness of breath, or people who have been admitted to the ICU and fitted
with ventilators, and even some who were crippled by pneumonia. A debate can go
on for days. We must therefor agree that when looked with unbiased eyes…
looking at the symptoms…with no tests given… you cannot tell the difference
between the two.
I have 8 other arguments in my other paper, but I believe
these three will suffice for what we are talking about here. If you disagree
with what I have said, please contact me with your rebuttals. I have tried,
throughout all of my research, to have an open mind, to be consistent, and use
only sources that are accepted by those who oppose my position. With that said,
my premise is comprised of a few points, one being that this virus is no better
than the Seasonal Flu.
Since the virus, our lives have changed so much. We have had
regulations thrust upon us. We have had rights taken away and closures of
businesses and entertainment throughout the nation.
We are forced to wear face masks in order to buy or sell
products/services in stores. It has become illegal to refuse to wear a mask. We
have been forced to stand six feet apart in public places and businesses have
been forced to implement social distancing or be fined.
Many of our rights have been taken away as well. Our
freedom of assembly has been taken away because we have to socially distance
ourselves. Our freedom of speech has been compromised. On Facebook, certain
posts have been flagged and removed because they don’t correlate with what the
media is purporting. I personally know Doctors who have been instructed not to
take pictures of empty hospital parking lots. Our freedom to travel has also
been suspended. Freedom of religion has been turned into online meetings.
One of the biggest things affected by this virus is the
effect on the economy and small businesses. The government has defined certain
people and businesses as essential. Everyone who is not “essential” must shut
down. Because of this and all the social distancing, the economy went into a
self-imposed recession. Unemployment has sky rocketed. Americans have had to
shut down their businesses and some have willingly lost their lives. Beaches
and parks have also been shut down as well.
All of this has happened because of the virus. Because of
this Seasonal Flu. And yet, the worst is yet to come.
What we have seen thus far is the blind willingness to obey
whatever the Governors have ordered. This should make every American fear for
his rights. Without a say on the matter, the Governors were able to take
control of our lives and abolish our constitutional rights. The premise has
been set, “give the Americans something to fear, and they will embrace the
abolition of their rights and civil liberties in the guise of safety.” No doubt
there are numerous conspiracy theories going around for what the future may
hold, but I only want to focus on one. Mandatory Vaccines.
Let me preface this by explaining my stance on Vaccines.
For years their has been an ongoing debate between those who are Pro Vaxers and
those who are Anti Vaxers. On the one side, you have those who are 100% Pro
Vaccinators. They trust whatever the Doctors and the CDC says and they consider
Anti Vaxers to be conspiracy theorists whose source of information comes from
blogs, celebrities, and homeopathic wannabe Doctors. The Anti Vaccinators are
people who believe that the ingredients for all the vaccines are harmful and
that Doctors want to give out as many vaccines as they can because they get a Government
kick-back. They think Pro-Vaxers are sheep, who wont do their own research. I
am neither a Pro- or Anti- Vaccinator. I believe that if two Doctors disagree
on something, then it is up to the patient to do his due diligence and research
and weigh out the pros and cons. I also think that some vaccines have been very
beneficial for our society like the Smallpox vaccine and the Polio vaccine. I
have done extensive research on Vaccines while only using sources that the
Pro-Vaxers would acknowledge as viable. I had done this research primarily
because I am labeled by both sides of the argument as being their opposite. So
the Pro-Vaxers call me an Anti-Vaxer and the Anti-Vaxers call me a Pro-Vaxer.
Instead of copying and pasting my entire Vaccine article here, I will pick 3 of
my most popular points made in the article.
1.
Hepatitis
A is a liver disease that is usually spread “when a person ingests fecal
matter” (vaccines.gov). There are two reasons as to why I reject this vaccine.
The first reason being that one of the ingredients used in this vaccine is
MRC-5. This stands for “Medical Research Council 5, human diploid cells (cells
containing two sets of chromosomes) derived from the normal lung tissues of a
14-week-old male fetus aborted for psychiatric reasons in 1966 in the United
Kingdom” (http://vaccines.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=005206). The
MRC-5 cell strain is used to develop this currently available vaccine
(http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/human-cell-strains-vaccine-development).
I am morally against the use of such cells in a vaccine. Secondly, I reject the
Hepatitis A vaccine because “there is a gap of medical knowledge in terms of
predicting who will have an adverse reaction and who will not”
(http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/Hepatitis-A.aspx). It is because of
this absence of knowledge that I must deem this vaccine unsafe
2.
In
regards to the Pneumococcal Conjugate (PCV13) vaccine, I would not mind my
children getting it. I know that the PCV13 vaccine only protects against 13 of
the ninety plus pneumococcal bacteria, but seeing as to how the ingredients
aren’t bad, I am fine with it. Although some may try to argue that aluminum
phosphate adjuvant and formaldehyde are dangerous, I beg to differ. The amount
of those ingredients present is not enough to be classified as toxic. For
example, “studies have shown that for a newborn of average weight of 6 to 8
pounds, the amount of formaldehyde in their body is 50-70 times higher than the
upper amount that they could receive from a single dose of a vaccine or from
vaccines administered over time”
(http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety).
Also, the side effects of the vaccine are mild. Thus, I see no problem getting
this vaccine.
3.
I
consider the Varicella vaccine (VAR), also known as the chickenpox vaccine, to
be somewhat ridiculous. Although it is true that open sores makes someone
vulnerable to other infections such as staff, it is unlikely that a child will
have such a complication. The same argument that is used in defense of certain
vaccines, “Only one in a million suffer from sever reactions to such-and-such
vaccine” can also be used against vaccines such as this one. “Only one in 2.7
million people with chicken pox suffer from an extreme life threatening case.”
Also, I must reject this vaccine if it is Varivax because both WI-38 human
diploid lung fibroblast cells and MRC-5 cells are used in the vaccine. In
addition, some severe and moderate side effects of the vaccine include
seizures. Although these are very rare, again, they are as rare as someone
dying form the virus or contracting staff. To my mind, the benefits of the
vaccine do not outweigh the risks
.
Some of
my main arguments for or against vaccines stems from logic and common sense.
For example, Doctors want to say the side-affects of a specific vaccine is very
rare, but at the same time, the severe side-effects of a specific virus like
the Varicella are just as rare as the side effects of the Vaccine. Another
thing to consider is that Doctors want to say they know what they are doing and
that technology is very sophisticated now, more so than before, and a lot of
these virus’ are now manageable. I was speaking with my Doctor a little while
ago and I told them that I didn’t want a certain vaccine. They were shocked and
said that I should trust them because they are a doctor. I said that if my
child contracted this virus, I trust that the doctors would be able to take
care of them because of how good they are… in order to disagree with my claim,
they would have to say they are not that good… if they agree with my claim,
they would have to respect my decision to reject the vaccine.
And now,
while this vaccine war is going on, laws are being passed making it mandatory
for children to get all the vaccines, despite religious convictions and health exceptions,
to go to school. At first, they were allowing people to choose based upon
personal convictions (religious, health, etc) but now there are no exemptions
unless you think your child has serious underlying health issues, they will
examine them by a board of Medical professionals. The vaccine argument moved
from whether or not they are harmful, to whether or not it is American to force
people to take Vaccines. Some Pro-Vaxers and Anti-Vaxers have united over this
issue because this is an infringement on our rights. And yet, now that the
Coronavirus has been classified as a pandemic,
those against mandatory vaccines will not be taken seriously. So now
what happens? What does the future hold for us?
There
are two things that are most disturbing about mandatory vaccines. Some people
are skeptical if it is even possible for vaccines to be mandatory, but most of
these people don’t have children so they are unaware of just how mandatory the
vaccines are… both for public and private school. Conspiracy theorists are
concerned that vaccines will become mandatory for everyone. Child and adult
alike. For example, if you want to go to public places like grocery stores,
walmarts, starbucks, etc, or if you want
to register your car or run your business, you will have to have all the
vaccines. Some of you read this and laugh, but it was only a few days ago that
you weren’t allowed to do any of these things listed without wearing a mask.
Mandatory
vaccines, monitoring people who have the vaccines, digital information, all of
these things and the theories surrounding Bill Gates go hand and hand. There
are two things coming out of the Gate Foundation that should raise some eyes
brows: “Vaccine Development and Surveillance” and “Digital Identity.”
“The
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded a “pilot study, conducted by MIT and
Rice University, into a potential vaccine delivery device that could ‘impart an
invisible mark detectable by a smartphone,’ it was entirely theoretical and
would not have been capable of tracking or monitoring.”
Digital
Identity could involve “cloud based storage of a person’s medical records and
personal identification documents—accessible only with the consent of the
owner” (Dailymail).
An invisible mark? Cloud based storage
with personal medical information? Digital
Identity with a patent number 2020060606?
“Bill
Gates, the Gates Foundation are in favor of developing digital certificates
that would certify that individuals, American citizens, have an immunity to
this virus and potentially other viruses going forward to then facilitate
travel and work and so forth” (Dailywire.com).
Attorney
General William Barrs response to this was, “I’m very concerned about the
slippery slope in terms of continuing encroachments on personal liberty”
(Dailywire.com).
The
State Bar Group wants the Coronavirus vaccine to be mandatory, regardless of
any objections. “Some Americans may push back Covid 19 Vaccinations for
religious, philosophical or personal reasons…[but] for the sake of public
health, mandatory vaccinations for Covid 19 should be required in the United
States as soon as it is possible.” They defended this position by saying,
“Mandatory vaccinations are supported by the authority of the state public
power when the vaccinations are necessary to protect the health of the
community” then the group goes on to cite 1905 U.S. Supreme Court decision in
Jacobson v. Massachusetts (businessinsider.com).
I’m not
trying to convince you that Bill Gates is the Anti Christ. I know a lot of
people who actually believe that. All that I am trying to say is that Mandatory
Vaccines for children and adults is very real and very possible. Please allow
me to reiterate and summarize a list each of my points:
1.
Within
the past year there has been an ongoing debate about Mandatory Vaccines
2.
Vaccines
became Mandatory for children to go to school
3.
The
Coronavirus is just a Seasonal Flu
4.
The Coronavirus
gave the Governors authority that surpasses that of the Constitution. Whether
we like it or not.
5.
The
economy crumbled People
couldn’t buy or sell without wearing a mask and social distancing because they
didn’t know who had the virus.
6.
Vaccines
have been made for the Coronavirus
7.
Once people have the Vaccine, we won’t need to
worry about wearing masks and social distancing
8.
The
Gates Foundation has funded and created services that will help monitor those
who have the vaccines
9.
The
State Barr wants to make the Coronavirus Mandatory despite personal reasons to
decline
In
conclusion, I wish my American people would wake up to what is happening around
us. We are being manipulated and we are heading down a slippery slope that will
inevitably force everyone to have a mark or some type of identification to show
that we are fully vaccinated. Many Christians are somewhat “triggered” by the
word “mark” in this type of context because Revelations talks about how you won’t
be able to buy or sell unless you have the mark of the Beast which is 666. Who
would have thought that in our modern times we wouldn’t have been able to buy
or sell without a mask?
No comments:
Post a Comment